Commonwealth v. Nenninger
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
BROSKY, Judge:
This is an appeal from the judgment of sentence 1 entered pursuant to a jury trial in which appellant was found guilty of rape 2 and involuntary deviate sexual intercourse. 3
Four issues are presented for our review: (1) whether the trial court properly allowed the admission of impeaching evidence consisting of two of appellant’s past crimen falsi crimes; (2) whether the trial court properly excluded evidence relating to the victim’s past sexual conduct under the Rape Shield Law; (3) whether the closing remarks of the District Attorney were a proper discussion of the evidence and…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Commonwealth v. BighumSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Commonwealth v. WrightSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Commonwealth v. RootsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Commonwealth v. AmosSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
- Commonwealth v. BlackSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Commonwealth v. MooreSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Commonwealth v. BoylesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Commonwealth v. HowardSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Commonwealth v. MeadowsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Commonwealth v. PostellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.