Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Nenninger

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 19, 1986No. 00290PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROSKY, Judge:

This is an appeal from the judgment of sentence 1 entered pursuant to a jury trial in which appellant was found guilty of rape 2 and involuntary deviate sexual intercourse. 3

Four issues are presented for our review: (1) whether the trial court properly allowed the admission of impeaching evidence consisting of two of appellant’s past crimen falsi crimes; (2) whether the trial court properly excluded evidence relating to the victim’s past sexual conduct under the Rape Shield Law; (3) whether the closing remarks of the District Attorney were a proper discussion of the evidence and…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BighumSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  2. Commonwealth v. WrightSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  3. Commonwealth v. RootsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  4. Commonwealth v. AmosSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  5. Commonwealth v. BlackSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MooreSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  2. Commonwealth v. BoylesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  3. Commonwealth v. HowardSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  4. Commonwealth v. MeadowsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  5. Commonwealth v. PostellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API