Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Meadows

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 6, 1989No. 3368PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POPOVICH, Judge:

David Andrew Meadows was tried before a jury in the Court of Common Pleas of Chester County and convicted of rape, indecent assault and corruption of minors. 18 Pa.C. S.A. §§ 3121, 3126, 6301. Following the denial of post-trial motions, he was sentenced to five to ten years imprisonment, and this appeal followed. We affirm.

In this direct appeal from his judgment of sentence, the appellant contends that the evidence against him was legal ly insufficient to support the convictions for rape and indecent assault. He also contends that the lower court erred in refusing to grant his…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BighumSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  2. Commonwealth v. RhodesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  3. Commonwealth v. BolishSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  4. Commonwealth v. TervalonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  5. Commonwealth v. BoyleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. FromalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  2. Commonwealth v. SattazahnSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  3. Commonwealth v. GonzalesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  4. Commonwealth v. SchwartzSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  5. Commonwealth v. CalderiniSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API