Legal Opinion

(PC) Austin v. Sherman

District Court, E.D. California

Decided January 28, 2020No. 1:18-cv-01630Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SAMPSON S. AUSTIN, Case No. 1:18-cv-01630-BAM (PC) 12 Plaintiff, SCREENING ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED 13 v. COMPLAINT 14 STU SHERMAN, et al., (ECF No. 15) 15 Defendants. THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE 16 17 18 19 Plaintiff Sampson S. Austin (“Plaintiff”) is a former state prisoner proceeding pro se and 20 in forma pauperis in this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff’s first amended 21 complaint, filed on August 20, 2019, is currently before the Court for screening. (ECF No. 15.) 22…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  5. Rizzo v. GoodeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API