Hayes v. International Harvester Co.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtSutton, J.
1. Where the transferee and holder of title-retention notes given for the purchase-money of machinery files a suit on the notes, the purchaser can not set up in bar or in abatement that the plaintiff has previously in the same court instituted against the defendant a purchase-money attachment, and a levy has been made on the machinery for the purchase of which the notes were given, and in which proceeding a judgment in rem had been rendered. In such circumstances, in the event judgment is rendered in the plaintiff’s favor, the court should so mold its judgment as to take care of the judgment…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Pape v. Woolford Realty Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1926
- Kinney v. Avery & Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1914
- Norman & Harrell v. Great Western Tailoring Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- Heath v. BatesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1883
- Kolb v. CheneySupreme Court of Georgia · 1879
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Lunsford v. HoweCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1944
- Eubanks v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1946
- Meade v. Willingham Finance Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1956