Legal Opinion

Eubanks v. Taylor

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 19, 1946No. 31392Published

1Opinion of the CourtFelton, J.

1. Where in an action upon a promissory note the defendant in his plea and answer seeks to avoid payment of the note upon the sole ground that the note has been materially altered since he signed it, and upon an oral motion in the nature of a general demurrer the plea and answer is stricken, the case is in default and the plaintiff is entitled to a directed verdict. Lunsford v. Howe, 71 Ga. App. 106 (30 S. E. 2d, 207); Pape v. Woolford Realty Co., 35 Ga. App. 284 (134 S. E. 174); Pierce v. Jones, 36 Ga. App. 561 (137 S. E. 296) ; Hayes v. International Harvester Co., 52 Ga. App. 328 (183 S.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Sims v. Georgia Railway & Electric Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  2. Pape v. Woolford Realty Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1926
  3. Heery v. BurkhalterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
  4. Roles v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
  5. Pierce v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1927

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API