Legal Opinion

Lunsford v. Howe

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 12, 1944No. 30451PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFelton, J.

1. In an action to recover $50, allegedly loaned by the plaintiff to the defendant, where the defendant denied two of the four-paragraphs of the petition, when the answer was stricken on demurrer, the ease was in default, and the plaintiff was entitled to a directed verdict. Pape v. Woolford Realty Co., 35 Ga. App. 284 (134 S. E. 174), and cit.; Pierce v. Jones, 30 Ga. App. 561 (137 S. E. 296); Hayes v. International Harvester Co., 52 Ga. App. 328 (183 S. E. 197).

2. Where in such a case a verdict was directed for the plaintiff, it was error to grant a new trial, the verdict being demanded.

3.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Sims v. Georgia Railway & Electric Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  2. Pape v. Woolford Realty Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1926
  3. Frazier v. BeasleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1939
  4. Roles v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
  5. Pierce v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1927

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cloud v. StewartCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1955
  2. Carter v. MansorCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1945
  3. Eubanks v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API