Legal Opinion

Gibbons v. Equitable Life Assur. Soc.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided March 10, 1949No. 163, Docket 21214PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AUGUSTUS N. HAND, Circuit Judge.

The question to be determined on this appeal is whether the eight employees of the defendants named above were specifically *338named as parties plaintiff to this action within the meaning of the Portal-to-Portal Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 251 et seq., even though their names were not set forth in the title to the action.

In October, 1944, an action was brought to recover unpaid overtime compensation alleged to be due under' the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 201 et seq. The complaint was by “Charles Gibbons, suing in his own behalf and as agent and representative…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. California Apparel Creators v. Wieder of California, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947
  2. Central Missouri Tel. Co. v. ConwellCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1948
  3. Bartels v. Sperti, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1947
  4. Bartels v. Piel Bros.District Court, E.D. New York · 1947

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Republic of China v. American Express Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951
  2. Sperling v. Hoffmann-La Roche, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
  3. David v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950
  4. Arrington v. National Broadcasting Co., Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 1982
  5. Mitchell v. Stewart Brothers Construction CompanyDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1960

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API