Legal Opinion
Central Missouri Tel. Co. v. Conwell
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided November 16, 1948No. 13756PublishedCited by 57 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GARDNER, Chief Judge.
This was an action brought under the Fair Labor Standards Act, Title 29 U.S.C.A. § 201 et seq., to recover compensation for overtime. It is alleged in the complaint that the action is brought by plaintiff Lillie Conwell “as an employee of the defendant, and on behalf of Laura Pinkepank against the defendant.” Two causes of action are comingled in the complaint, one in favor of Lillie Conwell and the other in favor of Laura Pinkepank. The complaint was filed January 21, 1947. The complaint alleges that from and after February 1, 1942, Lillie Conwell was employed by…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Tennessee Coal, Iron & Railroad v. Muscoda Local No. 123Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Armour & Co. v. WantockSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- McGahey v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by57 opinions
- Lisa A. Hultgren Victoria M. Smith and Daniel R. Turner v. County of Lancaster, Nebraska, a Political Subdivision of the State of NebraskaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
- Glenn L. Martin Nebraska Co. v. CulkinCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1952
- F. W. Stock & Sons, Inc. v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1952
- Hazlitt v. Fawcett Publications, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1953
- Markert v. Swift & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.