Legal Opinion
Jose Francisco Nunes v. John Ashcroft, United States Attorney General
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 8, 2004No. 02-55613PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND DISSENTS DENYING REHEARING EN BANC
ORDER
The opinion filed November 3, 2003, and appearing at 348 F.3d 815 (9th Cir.2003), is amended by the opinion filed simultaneously with this order.
With these amendments, the panel has voted to deny the petition for rehearing. Judges Rymer and Tallman have voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc and Judge Leighton so recommends.
The full court was advised of the petition for rehearing en banc. An active judge requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. The matter failed to receive a majority of the votes of the nonre-cused…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Jose Francisco Nunes v. John Ashcroft, United States Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
3Cited by5 opinions
- Nordberg v. Trilegiant Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2006
- APL Co. Pte. Ltd. v. UK Aerosols Ltd., Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2006
- Jose Francisco Nunes v. John Ashcroft, United States Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Nahum v. The Boeing CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2019
- Stonelake v. Meta Platforms IncDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2025