Legal Opinion

Nahum v. The Boeing Company

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided December 17, 2019No. 2:19-cv-01114Unknown

1Opinion

1 -UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 3 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 4 a ) ) 6 SETONDJI NAHUM, ) CASE NO. 2:19-cv-1114-BJR ) 7 Plaintiff. ) 8 ) ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND Vv. ) DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ 9 ) MOTION TO DISMISS; GRANTING ) DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO 19 || PHE BOEING COMPANY, et al., ) STRIKE; GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S ) MOTION TO AMEND; DENYING 1 Defendants. ) PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR ) POLYGRAPH EVIDENCE 12 {J 13 I, INTRODUCTION 14 1s Pro se Plaintiff Setonji Nahum (“Nahum”) brought this employment discrimination action 16 against Defendants The Boeing Company (“Boeing”) and one of…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  5. New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API