Legal Opinion
APL Co. Pte. Ltd. v. UK Aerosols Ltd., Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided July 7, 2006No. C 05-0646 MHPPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM & ORDER
Motion to Dismiss
PATEL, District Judge.
On February 11, 2005 plaintiff APL Co. Pte. Ltd. (“APL”) brought this action under federal maritime law, 28 U.S.C. section 1333, for breach of contract and negligence against defendants UK Aerosols Ltd. (“UKA”), U.G. Co., Inc. (“UG”), and Kam-dar Global, LLC (“Kamdar”). On February 28, 2006 plaintiff amended its complaint to add Imp-Ex Solutions, LLC (“Imp-Ex”) as a co-defendant. Now before the court is Imp-Ex’s motion to dismiss under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim. The court has considered the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Navarro v. BlockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Charles H. CAHILL; Aniko Der Cahill, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE CO., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- William George Bonin v. Arthur Calderon, as Warden of San Quentin State Prison James Rowland, Director of the California Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Great West Casualty Co. v. FlandrichDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2009
- Sallie Holly v. Alta Newport Hospital, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2020