Legal Opinion

Starr v. Starr

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 30, 1953No. Civ. 8190, 8258PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeek, J.

This is an appeal by the defendant from three orders of the trial court: (1) For support of the minor child of the parties pendente lite and attorney’s fees; (2) for attorney’s fees on appeal, and (3) for support of the child pending appeal. Since the appeals were predicated upon the same grounds the parties have stipulated that they should be treated as one appeal.

The pertinent facts (and they are not contradicted) are that in 1949 the plaintiff secured a decree of divorce from the defendant in the State of Nevada. Under the terms of that decree she was awarded the custody of the minor child…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. New York Ex Rel. Halvey v. HalveySupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Finlay v. FinlayNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
  3. Sampsell v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Yarborough v. YarboroughSupreme Court of the United States · 1933

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Worthley v. WorthleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Kulko v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Elkind v. ByckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Leverett v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  5. Chichester v. ChichesterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API