Legal Opinion

Brinkley v. Houk

District Court, E.D. Kentucky

Decided May 26, 2011No. Civil Action No. 5:09-cv-387-KKCPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER

KAREN K. CALDWELL, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on Defendants’ motion for summary judgment [DE 26], This motion has been fully briefed and is ripe for review. For the reasons set forth below, the Court will grant the motion in part and deny it in part.

I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND

On June 16, 2008, Stryker Endoscopy, a division of Stryker Sales Corporation, hired Michelle Temple as an at-will sales associate to assist Kenneth Aaron Pflugner, a sales representative who sold Stryker Endoscopy equipment to various hospitals and medical centers in the Lexington,…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Harris v. Burger King Corp.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2014
  2. Bader v. United Airlines, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2015
  3. Crump v. State Farm Mutual Auto Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2021
  4. Evans v. Woodland OaksDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2023
  5. Hunter v. Corizon Health, Inc.District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2021

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API