Hammond v. Haskell
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. N. P. Conrey, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
Action to recover upon a promissory note made and executed by defendants to plaintiff. Judgment went for plaintiff, from which defendants Haskell and Pike appeal upon the judgment-roll accompanied by bill of exceptions.
It appears from the findings that the note was made and delivered in consideration of an agreement whereby plaintiff promised defendants to return and surrender to a corporation known as the Home Bond and Building Association certain shares of stock which he owned and held in said corporation.
Contending that they are not supported by the evidence, appellants attack certain…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Kofoed v. GordonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Herberger v. HusmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- People v. AlmendaresCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
3Cited by5 opinions
- Smith v. Arthur D. Little, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1969
- Fenolio v. McDonaldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- Vaughan v. BrandtIdaho Supreme Court · 1912
- Murphy v. BridgeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
- Ramirez v. Charter Communications, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2024