Legal Opinion

Fenolio v. McDonald

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 25, 1959No. Civ. 9524PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeek, J.

The present controversy arises out of the sale of a bar and restaurant business which in turn resulted in actions being filed by both parties. The plaintiffs, by their action, sought to recover from defendants on two promissory notes which formed a part of the consideration, while the defendants, in their action, sought to rescind the agreement upon the ground of fraud. By stipulation the actions were consolidated. The court found in favor of plaintiffs in both actions and entered judgment accordingly. Defendants appeal solely from the judgment in favor of plaintiffs in their action on the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Norwood v. JuddCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  2. Tiedje v. Aluminum Taper Milling Co.California Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Tevis v. BlanchardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  4. Ferguson v. SchuenemannCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  5. Scales v. HoljeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Mountain State Bolt, Nut & Screw Co. v. Best-Way TransportationCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
  2. Armstrong Manors v. BurrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  3. Ruelas v. RuelasCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
  4. In Re Belmetals Mfg. Co.District Court, N.D. California · 1969
  5. Black Point Aggregates, Inc. v. Niles Sand & Gravel Co.California Court of Appeal · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API