Legal Opinion
Grillo v. Cannistraro
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided November 17, 1959PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKing, J.
This is an action to recover the amount which the plaintiff, a professional bondsman, paid the state as a surety on a recognizance, originally in the sum of $4000, entered into by the defendant’s son Rosario, as principal, and conditioned on Rosario’s appearance at the criminal session of the Superior Court to answer to a charge of bigamy and abide the order or judgment of the court thereon. The recognizance, unlike a bond, was signed by neither the principal nor the surety. 6 Am. Jur. 91, § 71. It was taken by an assistant clerk of the Superior Court on May 11,1955.
No material corrections…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Bartolotta v. CalvoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
- Calamita v. DeponteSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1936
- Smith v. DelaneySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1894
- McCormick v. BoylanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1910
3Cited by9 opinions
- Kerin Agency, Inc. v. West Haven Painting & Decorating, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1995
- Equipment Distributors, Inc. v. AdamsConnecticut Superior Court · 1976
- Adamowicz v. StevensConnecticut Appellate Court · 1969
- Feiler v. RosenbloomCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1980
- Biestek v. VarricchioConnecticut Superior Court · 1977
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.