Legal Opinion

Biestek v. Varricchio

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided February 4, 1977No. FILE No. 155Published

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam:.

The plaintiff, a licensed professional bondsman, brought this action to recover damages which resulted when the defendant, Helen Varricchio, refused to indemnify him for losses incurred upon the failure of the defendant’s son to appear for his court hearing. The court rendered judgment for the plaintiff, finding that Mrs. Varricchio was liable for the amount of the bond plus costs.

The facts found by the trial court reveal that William Hensley, the son of the defendant, was arrested on or prior to September 11, 1972, and charged with a felony. In an effort to secure the release of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bartolotta v. CalvoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
  2. McCormick v. BoylanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1910
  3. Grillo v. CannistraroSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API