State v. Switzer

The cardinal question presented for determination in this appeal is whether R. C, 1533.63 and *491533.301 apply to the acts of appellant in transporting the fish within this state.

A subsidiary question, which could be dispositive of. the appeal, is appellant’s contention that R. C. 1533.63, which allows the Chief of the Division of Wildlife by administrative order to change the limits as to the length of fish and specify a length different from that established by the statute is an unlawful delegation of legislative. power. i

R. C. 1533.63 provides, in part:

“Except as otherwise provided by the…