Legal Opinion

Senechal v. Bauman

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 10, 1962PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDenecke, J.

(Pro Tempore)

Plaintiff-appellant brought an action against defendant-respondent for injuries alleged to have been caused by defendant’s ordinary negligence. Defendant was the owner of the car. Plaintiff made no payment for his transportation and was driving at the time of the accident. Plaintiff alleged that the accident was caused by defendant, who was sitting in the front seat beside plaintiff, taking control of the steering wheel and causing the car to veer off the road. Plaintiff’s evidence was that defendant took this action because of an erroneous belief that plaintiff had lost control…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Hasbrook v. WingateOhio Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Blanchard v. OgletreeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1929
  3. Follansbee v. BenzenbergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  4. Dobbs v. SugiokaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1947
  5. Kudrna v. AdamskiOregon Supreme Court · 1950

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Spring v. LilesOregon Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Fullerton v. WhiteOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  3. First National Bank v. MaladyOregon Supreme Court · 1966
  4. First National Bank v. MaladyOregon Supreme Court · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API