Legal Opinion · Dissent

First National Bank v. Malady

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 12, 1966Published

1DissentPerry, J.

I am unable to agree with, the holding of the majority that, because the plaintiff insurance company brought this declaratory judgment action, the burden of proof as to all issues rests upon the plaintiffs. The only issue here presented is whether the driver of the automobile at the time the accident occurred, and numerous claims arose, was driving the automobile with the permission of the named insured. If he was driving with permission, he was an insured. If he was not driving the vehicle with permission, he was not covered by the policy.

It is an established rule of law that one who claims…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Pacific Portland Cement Co. v. Food MacHinery & Chemical CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
  2. Reliance Life Ins. Co. v. BurgessCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1940
  3. Bauer v. ClarkCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1947
  4. MFA Mut. Ins. Co. v. QuinnMissouri Court of Appeals · 1953
  5. JARVIS ET UX v. Indemnity Ins. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1961

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API