Legal Opinion

State v. Hartye

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided March 24, 1987PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

STEIN, J.

In this case, as in State v. O’Connor, 105 N.J. 399 (1987), we consider the relationship between the presumptions of incarceration contained in N.J.S.A. 2C:44-1d and le and a term of imprisonment imposed as a condition of probation pursuant to N.J.S.A. 2C:43-2 b(2). The specific question presented in this appeal is whether the presumption of non-imprisonment applicable to first-time offenders convicted of third- or fourth-degree crimes precludes the imposition of a term of imprisonment as a condition of probation. The Appellate Division held…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State v. RothSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
  2. State v. YarboughSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
  3. State v. HodgeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
  4. State v. KruseSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
  5. State v. IvanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1960

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. State v. DunbarSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
  2. State v. BrimageSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1998
  3. State v. O'CONNORSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
  4. Tianti v. William Raveis Real Estate, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  5. State v. PillotSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1989

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API