Legal Opinion

State v. O'CONNOR

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided March 24, 1987PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

STEIN, J.

In this case, and in State v. Hartye, 105 N.J. 411 (1987), which we also decide today, we are called on to determine the proper relationship between a term of imprisonment imposed as a condition of probation, N.J.S.A. 2C:43-2b(2), and the pre sumptions of incarceration contained in N.J.S.A. 2C:44-1d and -1e. Specifically, the issue in this case is whether the “split sentence” authorized by N.J.S.A. 2C:43-2b(2) may be imposed on a defendant who has pled guilty to a second-degree offense, which normally carries a presumption of imprisonment.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. RothSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
  2. State v. YarboughSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
  3. State v. HodgeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
  4. Alexander v. New Jersey Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1956
  5. State v. KovackSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. State v. JarbathSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1989
  2. State v. EversSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2003
  3. State v. SainzSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
  4. State v. KrompholdSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2000
  5. State v. PillotSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1989

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API