State v. Brimage
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
GARIBALDI, J.
We are again presented with issues relating to Section 12 of the Comprehensive Drug Reform Act of 1987, N.J.S.A. 2C:35-1 to 36A-1 (hereinafter “CDRA”). Under N.J.S.A 2C:35-12 (“Section 12”), a prosecutor may, through a negotiated plea agreement or post-conviction agreement with a defendant, waive the mandatory minimum sentence specified for any offense under the CDRA. To satisfy the constitutional requirements of the separation of powers doctrine, N.J. Const, art. III, ¶ 1, this Court in State v. Vasquez held that prosecutorial discretion…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- State v. RothSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
- State v. LeonardisSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1977
- State v. HodgeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
- State v. JarbathSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1989
- Town Tobacconist v. KimmelmanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by63 opinions
- In Re CarrollNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2001
- State v. BellamySupreme Court of New Jersey · 2003
- State v. James W. Robinson (070556)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2014
- State v. ThomasSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2006
- State v. HernandezSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2011
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.