Legal Opinion

State v. Brimage

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided February 19, 1998PublishedCited by 63 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

GARIBALDI, J.

We are again presented with issues relating to Section 12 of the Comprehensive Drug Reform Act of 1987, N.J.S.A. 2C:35-1 to 36A-1 (hereinafter “CDRA”). Under N.J.S.A 2C:35-12 (“Section 12”), a prosecutor may, through a negotiated plea agreement or post-conviction agreement with a defendant, waive the mandatory minimum sentence specified for any offense under the CDRA. To satisfy the constitutional requirements of the separation of powers doctrine, N.J. Const, art. III, ¶ 1, this Court in State v. Vasquez held that prosecutorial discretion…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. State v. RothSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
  2. State v. LeonardisSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1977
  3. State v. HodgeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
  4. State v. JarbathSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1989
  5. Town Tobacconist v. KimmelmanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1983

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by63 opinions

  1. In Re CarrollNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2001
  2. State v. BellamySupreme Court of New Jersey · 2003
  3. State v. James W. Robinson (070556)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2014
  4. State v. ThomasSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2006
  5. State v. HernandezSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2011

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API