Legal Opinion
State v. Wright
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided June 6, 2000No. AC 18649PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SPEAR, J.
The defendant, David Wright, appeals from the judgment of the trial court, rendered after a juiy trial, of possession of a narcotic substance with the intent to sell in violation of General Statutes § 21a-278 (a),2 possession of a narcotic substance with intent to *138sell in violation of General Statutes § 2 la-277 (a)* *3 and possession of a narcotic substance with the intent to sell within 1500 feet of a school in violation of General Statutes § 21a-278a (b).4 The defendant claims that the court improperly (1) denied his motion to suppress *139statements that he allegedly made during…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. SwintonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- State v. BerubeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- State v. KimbleConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
- State v. PierceConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- State v. BrownConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.