Legal Opinion
Molybdenum Corp. v. SUPERIOR CT., CTY. OF PIMA
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided June 13, 1972No. 2 CA-CIV 1208PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOWARD, Judge.
The petitioner, defendant in a pending lawsuit for breach of contract, seeks relief from an order denying its motion to dismiss on the ground of lack of jurisdiction. Since appellate intervention by way of special action is available in appropriate cases, such as here, we assume jurisdiction. See Industrial Commission v. Superior Court, 5 Ariz.App. 100, 423 P.2d 375 (1967).
The basis for the defendant’s motion to dismiss was that the court had acquired no personal jurisdiction of it by service of process pursuant to Rule 4(e) (2), Ariz.R. Civ.P., 16 A.R.S., as amended. The…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Phillips v. Anchor Hocking Glass CorporationArizona Supreme Court · 1966
- Beck v. SpindlerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
- Compania De Astral, S. A. v. Boston Metals Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1954
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Amba Marketing Systems, Inc. v. Jobar International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- Aries v. Palmer Johnson, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1987
- Powder Horn Nursery, Inc. v. Soil & Plant Laboratory, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1973
- Garrett v. Ruth Originals Corp.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1978
- G.T. Helicopters, Inc. v. Helicopters, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.