Legal Opinion
Garrett v. Ruth Originals Corp.
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided August 28, 1978No. C-2-77-540PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
KINNEARY, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the defendants’ motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction or, in the alternative, to transfer venue of this action to the Western District of North Carolina. For the reasons which follow, the Court has determined that the defendants’ motion, except as to the defendant Ruth Combs, is without merit.
The plaintiff, R. Alan Garrett, brought this diversity action for breach of a contract of employment against the defendants Ruth Originals Corporation and Ruth Combs. Ruth Originals Corporation [hereinafter “the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Milliken v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Priess v. FisherfolkDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1982
- Bacik v. PeekDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1993
- Stewart Coach Industries, Inc. v. MooreDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1981
- Neff Athletic Lettering Co. v. WaltersDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1981
- Barile v. University of VirginiaOhio Court of Appeals · 1981
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.