Powder Horn Nursery, Inc. v. Soil & Plant Laboratory, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HAIRE, Judge.
This appeal presents the question of whether the courts of Arizona may, consistent with the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, exercise in personam jurisdiction over a California corporation and two individual California defendants, when service of process has been made in California pursuant to Rule 4(e) (2), Rules of Civil Procedure, 16 A.R. S.
The defendants have been sued in tort by an Arizona plant nursery for damage to its plants which allegedly occurred because of negligently prepared soil analyses and soil treatment recommendations for which the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Good Hope Industries, Inc. v. Ryder Scott Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
- Amba Marketing Systems, Inc. v. Jobar International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- Parks v. MacRo-dynamics, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1979
- Davis v. Metro Productions, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Frank Savarese v. Edrick Transfer & Storage, Inc., a Wisconsin CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.