Legal Opinion
Fischl v. Fischl
New York Supreme Court
Decided February 5, 1969PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtBertram Harnett, J.
A separation agreement was executed by the parties on May 5, 1967 in New York and subsequéntly incorporated into, but not merged in, a divorce decree secured in Mexico.
The plaintiff, Claire Fischl, now moves for an order awarding her summary judgment and for reimbursement under the agree*283ment of certain income taxes paid by her. The defendant, Bruce Fischl, cross-moves for summary judgment and dismissal of the plaintiff’s cause of action.
Among the provisions presented for scrutiny is one which reads: 1 ‘ Should any dispute arise hereunder the parties will submit the same to their respective…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- City of New York v. New York Central RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
- Moore v. MaddockNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
- Levant American Commercial Co. v. W. Wells & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919
- Moore v. MaddockAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1928
- Weisberg v. Art Work ShopAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929
3Cited by1 opinion
- Frederes v. Ferguson (In re Frederes)District Court, W.D. New York · 1990