Legal Opinion

Joseph Triner Corp. v. McNeil

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided June 10, 1936No. 23475. Decree affirmedPublishedCited by 70 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Wilson

This is a proceeding instituted by the plaintiff seeking relief under the provisions of the Fair Trade act, approved July 8, 1935. (Ill. State Bar Stat. 1935, p. 3091; Smith’s Stat. 1935, p. 2893.) The title of the statute expresses its purpose as “An act to protect trade-mark owners, distributors and the public against injurious and uneconomic practices in the distribution of articles of standard quality under a trade-mark, brand or name.” Section 1 provides:

“Sec. 1. No contract relating to the sale or re-sale of a commodity which bears, or the label or content of which bears, the…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Munn v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  3. Connolly v. Union Sewer Pipe Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1902
  4. Champlin Rfg. Co. v. Corporation Commission of OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  5. Noble State Bank v. HaskellSupreme Court of the United States · 1911

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by70 opinions

  1. Old Dearborn Distributing Co. v. Seagram-Distillers Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. State v. EvansIdaho Supreme Court · 1952
  3. State v. LangleyWyoming Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Delany v. BadameIllinois Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Goldsmith v. Mead Johnson & Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1939

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API