Legal Opinion
Munoz v. Kolender
District Court, S.D. California
Decided June 14, 2002No. 00cv2323-LAB(CJA)PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
BURNS, United States Magistrate Judge.
This matter is before the court on defendant’s Motion For Summary Judgment (“Motion”) in this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Plaintiff David S. Munoz (“Munoz”) is proceeding pro se and informa pauperis with a verified Complaint against San Diego County Sheriff, William Kolender (“Sheriff Kolender” or “Defendant”). He challenges his confinement in County Jail and the conditions of his confinement there while awaiting judicial proceedings to determine his status under California’s Sexually Violent Predator…
2Cases cited68 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Hydrick v. McDanielCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Hydrick v. HunterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Galen v. County of Los AngelesDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2004
- Hydrick v. HunterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Woodard v. MaybergDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2003
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.