Legal Opinion

Warren v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided September 15, 1987No. 52834PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REINHARD, Judge.

Movant appeals from an order denying his Rule 27.26 motion without an evidentia-ry hearing. We affirm.

Pursuant to a guilty plea agreement, movant pled guilty on March 6, 1986, to two counts of first-degree sexual abuse and separate counts of sodomy and rape. The victims were movant’s five- and six-year-old nieces. Under the plea agreement the state dismissed one sodomy count and one rape count. At the guilty plea hearing, the prosecutor stated he had evidence that movant was a prior and persistent offender which would permit sentence enhancement if movant were convicted by a…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Richardson v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. Rice v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1979
  3. Porter v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. Careaga v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. Chapman v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Ketcherside v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. Fynn v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
  3. Pelton v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. State v. AzizMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. Cooper v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API