Steve v. Commissioner of Correction
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the CourtLavery, J.
This is an appeal by the petitioner, Carl Steve, from a judgment of the habeas court that granted him partial relief on his claim that the respondent commissioner of correction had miscalculated the credits on his criminal sentence. The respondent cross appeals. The petitioner claims that the habeas court was incorrect (1) in not ordering the respondent to credit the petitioner fully for time served or credited against a vacated sentence, and (2) in denying the petitioner the seven day job credit and outstandingly meritorious performance award credit for the vacated sentence to reduce the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Alabama v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Moscone v. MansonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- United States v. Lewis MarkusCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Whitaker v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- Graham v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
- Boyd v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- Boyd v. LantzDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2007
- James v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2017
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.