State v. Large
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KESSLER, Presiding Judge.
¶ 1 Jonathan Elijah Large (“Large”) appeals his conviction and sentence for one count of armed robbery. We conclude, in light of Alleyne v. United States, — U.S. —, 133 S.Ct. 2151, 2163, 186 L.Ed.2d 314 (2013), that Large was entitled to have a jury determine whether he was on parole when he committed the offense because his release status increased the statutory minimum sentence that could be imposed. However, because it is undisputed that he was on parole when he committed the offense, there was no prejudice in having the court find that fact. Accordingly, we…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Alleyne v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- State v. HendersonArizona Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. MurrayArizona Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. HunterArizona Supreme Court · 1984
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- People v. BarnesMichigan Supreme Court · 2018
- State of Arizona v. Victor Kyle LizardiCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
- Barnes v. BerniniCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2018
- Ortiz v. ShinnDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2021
- People of Michigan v. Timothy L BarnesMichigan Supreme Court · 2018
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.