Legal Opinion

Ortiz v. Shinn

District Court, D. Arizona

Decided March 5, 2021No. 4:17-cv-00623Unknown

1Opinion

1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Armando Andres Ortiz, No. CV-17-00623-TUC-JGZ 10 Petitioner, ORDER 11 v. 12 David Shinn, 13 Respondent. 14 15 Pending before the Court is Magistrate Judge D. Thomas Ferraro’s Report and 16 Recommendation (R&R) recommending that the District Court deny and dismiss Armando 17 Andres Ortiz’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. (Doc. 22.) Ortiz filed an objection, and 18 the State filed a response. (Docs. 23, 24.) 19 After an independent review of the parties’ briefing and of the record, the Court will 20 adopt…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API