Newman v. Stein
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROBERT J. WARD, District Judge.
These are applications for attorneys’ fees by counsel for plaintiffs and for objector, Rose Lerman, in a shareholders’ derivative action settled, with the approval of the Court (McLean, J.), on December 29, 1971, after trial but before a decision had been rendered. CCH Fed. See.L.Rep. [1971-72 Transfer Binder] 1193,316 (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 29, 1971). For the reasons hereinafter stated, the application of plaintiffs’ attorneys is granted in the amount of $750,000 and the application of objector Lerman’s attorneys is denied.
The plaintiffs alleged that the sale of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,547 Arthur Newman v. Howard M. Stein, and Morrie Benson and Rose Lerman, Objectants-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
- Smolowe v. Delendo CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,093 Judah Rosenfeld, Etc. v. E. R. BlackCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
- Jules E. Angoff v. Bernard Goldfine, Harold Brown v. Bernard GoldfineCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1959
- Murphy v. North American Light & Power Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1940
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Moses v. McGarveyAlaska Supreme Court · 1980
- Liebman v. J. W. Petersen Coal & Oil Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1974
- In Re Coordinated Pretrial Proceedings in Antibiotic Antitrust ActionsDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1975
- Milstein v. WernerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1973
- Clark v. Lomas & Nettleton Financial Corp.District Court, N.D. Texas · 1978
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.