Legal Opinion

Murphy v. North American Light & Power Co.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided June 14, 1940PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOOLSEY, District Judge.

I fix at $200,000 the total allowances to plaintiffs’ attorneys for all the work done and disbursements made by them and not taxed in these two causes and in all ancillary proceedings before the Securities and Exchange Commission necessitated in order to implement the decision of the Circuit Court of Appeals, and

I hereby provide that these total allowances are to be divided equally between William M. Dederick, Esq., attorney for complainant John H. Murphy, and Lawrence R. Condon, Esq., attorney for plaintiffs John W. Walters, et al., and, accordingly,

I order the North'…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Sprague v. Ticonic National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  2. United States v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. Trustees v. GreenoughSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  4. Johnson v. Manhattan Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
  5. In Re OsofskyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1931

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Mills v. Electric Auto-Lite Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Dolgow v. AndersonDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1968
  3. Smolowe v. Delendo CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
  4. Holden v. Construction MacHinery CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1972
  5. Jules E. Angoff v. Bernard Goldfine, Harold Brown v. Bernard GoldfineCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1959

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API