Legal Opinion
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,093 Judah Rosenfeld, Etc. v. E. R. Black
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided June 22, 1971No. 35820_1PublishedCited by 76 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FRIENDLY, Chief Judge:
The appeal here is by plaintiffs, stockholders in what was The Lazard Fund, Inc. (“the Fund”), a mutual fund organized in 1958 and registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (“the Act”). Their complaints, brought in the District Court for the Southern District of New York, sought, inter alia, an accounting of profits allegedly realized by Lazard Fi’eres (“Lazard”), the organizer and investment adviser of the Fund, when, in 1967, it ceased to be the adviser and was replaced by Moody’s Ad-visors & Distributors, Inc. (“Moody’s A & D”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Mills v. Electric Auto-Lite Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Meinhard v. SalmonNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Kline v. Burke Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Capital Gains Research Bureau, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by76 opinions
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,547 Arthur Newman v. Howard M. Stein, and Morrie Benson and Rose Lerman, Objectants-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
- Fogel v. ChestnuttCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
- Leist v. SimplotCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
- Fogel v. ChestnuttCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 96,263 Frank S. Yamamoto, Individually And, Derivatively, on Behalf of Investors Finance, Inc. v. Kazuo OmiyaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.