Legal Opinion
Hewlett-Packard Co. v. Diringer
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided March 2, 1999No. Civ.A. 95 N 1435PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
NOTTINGHAM, District Judge,
This declaratory-judgment action requires the court to decide whether the federal Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 preempts certain provisions of the Workers’ Compensation Act of Colorado. Plaintiffs Hewlett-Packard Company and Hewlett-Packard Company Employee Benefits Organization [collectively, “Hewlett-Packard,” unless otherwise noted] ask this court to declare that: (1) the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, 29 U.S.C.A. §§ 1001 to 1461 (West 1999) [hereinafter “ERISA”] preempts Colo.Rev.Stat. §…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Engfer v. General Dynamics Advanced Information System, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
- Farrell v. American Heavy Lift Shipping Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2001
- Engfer v. General Dynamics Advanced Information System, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
- Larsen v. Cigna Healthcare Mid-Atlantic, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2002
- Thomas v. Engfer v. General Dynamics Advanced Information Systems, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic DevelopmentSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.