Scott v. Coachman
Supreme Court of Alabama
1ConcurrenceMurdock, Justice
By statute, the legislature has chosen mayors, and not city councils, to be the *611repositories of the general power to hire and fire municipal employees. The statute by which the legislature has made this choice, § 11^13-81, Ala.Code 1975, by merely accommodating those situations “otherwise provided by law,” is reasonably understood simply to mean “law” that is equal to or superior to that statute. I cannot conclude that the legislature intended to say: “We choose by statute to give this power to mayors as a general rule, but only to the extent that a local city council does not override our…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Brooks v. Northglen Ass'nTexas Supreme Court · 2004
- Manchin v. BrowningWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1982
- Trujillo v. TanuzNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1973
- Fountain v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1919
- Yates v. CasteelSupreme Court of Missouri · 1932
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.