Legal Opinion

Cruz v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided October 13, 1939No. 1893PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PHILLIPS, Circuit Judge.

Bernardo Cruz, Carlos Garcia, Julio Griego, Arturo Maes, Benito Paiz, Ben Gandert, and Alfonso Duran were charged by indictment with conspiracy to commit offenses against the United States, namely, to violate the provisions of Section 12 of the Emergency Relief Appropriation Act of 1937, SO Stat. 352, IS U.S.C.A. §§ 721-728 note.

During the trial the indictment was dismissed as to Gandert and Duran. A motion for a directed verdict on the ground that the evidence did not establish the conspiracy charge was interposed by the remaining defendants at the close of the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Chadwick v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1905
  2. Commonwealth v. BeneschMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  3. Crapo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1939
  4. Hamburg-American Steam Packet Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1918
  5. Landen v. StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1924

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Hi Holdridge, A/K/A Hiram Holdridge, Larry Shumm and Neil Delmar Haworth v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1960
  2. Albert Edwards v. United States of America, S. Frank Edwards v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1964
  3. United States v. MacKCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940
  4. United States v. Thomas L. Thaggard, Sr., and Vanzie BeasleyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
  5. Heald v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1949

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API