Legal Opinion
Lifeline Ltd. No. II v. Connecticut General Life Insurance
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided March 15, 1993No. 92-CV-74752PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
FEIKENS, District Judge.
Background
Plaintiff Lifeline Limited No. II (“Lifeline”) files suit against defendants Connecticut General Life Insurance Company (“Conn Gen”), Preferred Health Care Corporation (“PHC”), Joseph L. Posch, Jr., (“Posch”), and James Kinville (“Kinville”) alleging two counts of tortious interference with business expectancy and one count of restraint of trade in violation of § 1 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1.
Defendant Conn Gen is under contract with non-party General Motors Corporation (“GM”) to perform certain delegated administrative functions on…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Eastman Kodak Co. v. Image Technical Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Copperweld Corp. v. Independence Tube Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Williams v. 5300 Columbia Pike Corp.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1995
- Lifeline Ltd. No. II v. Connecticut General Life InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1993
- Lifeline Limited No. II v. Connecticut General Life InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1993
- Michigan Division-Monument Builders v. Michigan Cemetery Ass'nDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2006
- Moellers North America, Inc. v. MSK Covertech, Inc.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1995
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.