Legal Opinion

Lifeline Limited No. II v. Connecticut General Life Insurance

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided July 22, 1993No. 2:92-cv-74752PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

FEIKENS, District Judge.

I. Introduction

A. Procedural History

Plaintiff Lifeline Limited No. II (“Lifeline”) has filed a Second Amended Complaint against defendants Connecticut General Life Insurance Company (“Conn Gen”), Preferred Health Care Corporation (“PHC”), and James Kinville (“Kinville”) 1 alleging one claim of promissory estoppel and one claim of fraudulent misrepresentation. In plaintiffs original Complaint, it alleged one count of restraint of trade in violation of § 1 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C., and two counts of tortious interference with business expectan-ey.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Hi-Way Motor Co. v. International Harvester Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1976
  2. State Bank of Standish v. CurryMichigan Supreme Court · 1993
  3. John W. Dugan v. Richard L. Brooks, Individually and in His Official Capacity as a Cleveland State University Law Enforcement OfficerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
  4. Van Marter v. American Fidelity Fire InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. Higgins v. LawrenceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Holland v. Cline Bros. Min. Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1995
  2. P.R.A. Company v. Arglass Yamamura SE, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API