Lifeline Limited No. II v. Connecticut General Life Insurance
District Court, E.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
FEIKENS, District Judge.
I. Introduction
A. Procedural History
Plaintiff Lifeline Limited No. II (“Lifeline”) has filed a Second Amended Complaint against defendants Connecticut General Life Insurance Company (“Conn Gen”), Preferred Health Care Corporation (“PHC”), and James Kinville (“Kinville”) 1 alleging one claim of promissory estoppel and one claim of fraudulent misrepresentation. In plaintiffs original Complaint, it alleged one count of restraint of trade in violation of § 1 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C., and two counts of tortious interference with business expectan-ey.…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Hi-Way Motor Co. v. International Harvester Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1976
- State Bank of Standish v. CurryMichigan Supreme Court · 1993
- John W. Dugan v. Richard L. Brooks, Individually and in His Official Capacity as a Cleveland State University Law Enforcement OfficerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
- Van Marter v. American Fidelity Fire InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
- Higgins v. LawrenceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Holland v. Cline Bros. Min. Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1995
- P.R.A. Company v. Arglass Yamamura SE, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2024