Legal Opinion
Lifeline Ltd. No. II v. Connecticut General Life Insurance
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided April 12, 1993No. 92-CV-74752PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
FEIKENS, District Judge.
Introduction
Plaintiff Lifeline Limited No. II (“Lifeline”) files suit against defendants Connecticut General Life Insurance Company (“Conn Gen”), Preferred Health Care Corporation (“PHC”), Joseph L. Posch, Jr., (“Posch”), and James Kinville (“Kinville”) alleging two counts of tortious interference with business expectancy and one count of restraint of trade in violation of § 1 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C.
In an Opinion and Order dated March 15, 1993, 821 F.Supp. 1201, I granted defendants’ motions to dismiss plaintiffs antitrust claim but denied…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Palsgraf v. Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Clark Lee Smith v. Julian Boyd Laverta Barns Gloria Blocker Dav KovacCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
- Prysak v. R L Polk Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1992
- Feldman v. GreenMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984
- Omar v. Sea-Land Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Williams v. 5300 Columbia Pike Corp.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1995
- United States v. Certain Land Situated in DetroitDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2001
- In Re Baseball Bat Antitrust Litigation (MDL No. 1249)District Court, D. Kansas · 1999
- Lifeline Limited No. II v. Connecticut General Life InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1993
- Moellers North America, Inc. v. MSK Covertech, Inc.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1995
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.