Legal Opinion

Panepinto v. New York Life Insurance

New York Court of Appeals

Decided November 25, 1997PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Levine, J.

This action involves a dispute over the meaning of language found in two insurance policies that ultimately will determine whether plaintiff’s action on the policies is time-barred. Each policy provides for the payment by defendant New York Life Insurance Company of $1,000 per month in the event of the "total disability” of plaintiff. "Total disability” is initially defined as "the complete inability of the insured to perform any and every duty pertaining to his or her occupation.” After five years of such disability, the definition becomes "the complete…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Andre v. PomeroyNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
  2. MATTER OF SCHULZ v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. Wall v. Pennsylvania Life Insurance Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Mark Hofkin v. Provident Life & Accident Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
  5. Oglesby v. Penn Mutual Life InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1995

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Audrey Shaps v. Provident Life & Accident Insurance Company, Provident Life and Casualty Insurance Company, a Foreign CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2001
  2. Kaplan v. Northwestern Mutual Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
  3. Charles Wetzel v. Lou Ehlers Cadillac Group Long Term Disability Insurance Program Reliance Standard Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  4. Furleigh v. Allied Group Inc.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 2003
  5. Willey v. United Mercantile Life InsuranceNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1999

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API