Legal Opinion

Kaplan v. Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided January 10, 2000No. 43464-1-IPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBaker, J.

— Jerrold Kaplan has been disabled by obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD) since 1989, but did not file a claim under his disability insurance policies until he was actually diagnosed in 1994. In his claim, Kaplan requested disability benefits starting from 1989, but Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company declined Kaplan’s claim based upon failure to give notice and proof of claim “as soon as reasonably possible,” as required by the insurance policies in question.

Kaplan sued, and argued that he did give notice as soon as reasonably possible under the circumstances because he didn’t realize…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. William Radobenko and Mary G. Radobenko, His Wife, Individually and as Husband and Wife v. Automated Equipment Corporation, a California CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
  2. State Farm General Insurance v. EmersonWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Herron v. Tribune Publishing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Scott v. Pacific West Mountain ResortWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Oregon Automobile Insurance v. SalzbergWashington Supreme Court · 1975

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Clementi v. Nationwide Mut. Fire Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2001
  2. Kaplan v. Northwestern Mutual Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
  3. Taylor v. BellCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
  4. Thomas L. Sluman v. State of WashingtonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018
  5. Keith v. Allstate Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2001

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API