Legal Opinion

United States v. Floriberto Estrada-Bahena, Also Known as Heriberto Estrada-Bahena

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided January 27, 2000No. 99-3280PublishedCited by 62 opinions

1Per curiam

Floriberto Estrada-Bahena challenges the sentence imposed by the district court1 after he pleaded guilty to being found in the United States without the Attorney General’s consent, after having been convicted of an aggravated felony and deported, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and (b)(2). His counsel has filed a brief and moved to withdraw pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Although we granted Estrada-Bahena permission to file a pro se supplemental brief, he has not done so.

As part of his plea agreement, Estrada-Bahena waived his right to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. United States v. Harry Lee MichelsenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
  3. United States v. Andre WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998

3Cited by62 opinions

  1. United States v. Gul Khan KhattakCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
  2. Robert St. Pierre v. Roger D. Cowan, Warden, Menard Correctional CenterCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
  3. United States v. John Robert Andis, Also Known as Robert AndisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002
  4. United States v. F. Corona MoretCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007
  5. United States v. Lance HackCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API