Legal Opinion

Matthews v. Bowser

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided January 20, 1964No. 19,879PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMote, J.

— This is an action in replevin for possession of a dragline machine commenced by appellants in the lower court. It seems that appellants moved the drag-line machine onto appellee Bowser’s farm and proceeded to remove approximately four thousand (4,000) yards of gravel from the said farm. Appellants did not pay for said gravel and appellee Bowser proceeded to conduct a public sale of the dragline machine. Appellee Howard Martin and Howard Martin, Inc., hereinafter called appellee Martin, purchased the machine at the sale.

The trial court held in favor of the defendants, appellees herein.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Dudley v. PiggIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Over v. ShannonIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Walling v. BurgessIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Bowes v. LambertIndiana Court of Appeals · 1943
  5. City of East Chicago v. State Ex Rel. PitzerIndiana Supreme Court · 1949

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Charlie Stuart Oldsmobile, Inc. v. SmithIndiana Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. Coghill v. BadgerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. DeHart v. AndersonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979
  4. Ford Motor Credit Co. v. GarnerDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1988
  5. Charlie Stuart Oldsmobile, Inc. v. SmithIndiana Court of Appeals · 1976

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API