Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Charlie Stuart Oldsmobile, Inc. v. Smith

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided November 22, 1976No. 2-1274A289Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Opinion Concurring in Part, Dissenting in Part

Sullivan, J.

I concur in that portion of the decision which holds that the Court erred in awarding damages for mental anguish. That very error, however, in my view,, compels reversal of the judgment and remand of the cause for a new trial solely with respect to the issue of compensatory damages for injury to personal property.

In the case before us, affirmance of the judgment to the extent of $4,000 presupposes that the' Court below, as 'the trier of fact, believed Plaintiff’s property damage to be precisely in the amount which Plaintiff stated to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Weenig v. WoodIndiana Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. Charlie Stuart Oldsmobile, Inc. v. SmithIndiana Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. Superior Laundry Co. v. RoseIndiana Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Chicago, Indianapolis & Louisville Railway Co. v. BrownIndiana Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Halstead v. StahlIndiana Court of Appeals · 1911

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API