Legal Opinion

Walling v. Burgess

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided February 26, 1890No. 12,500PublishedCited by 32 opinions

From the Noble Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

This is an action brought by the appellees, as plaintiffs, against the appellants, to obtain possession of real estate and quiet title thereto. The complaint is in two paragraphs. The first alleges that appellees are the owners and entitled to possession of the undivided one-half of lots 70 and 73, in Mitchell's addition to the city of Kendallville, Noble county, Indiana, and that appellants have possession without right, claiming title.

The second paragraph alleges that appellees and appellants are tenants in common of the real estate, and that appellants are in possession, claiming title to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Shanks v. KleinSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  2. Haas v. ShawIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Over v. ShannonIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Grissom v. MooreIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Krug v. DavisIndiana Supreme Court · 1885

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Tobin v. McClellanIndiana Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Smith v. Wells Manufacturing Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Vulcan Iron Works Co. v. Electro Magnetic Gold Mining Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Valentine v. WysorIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. BodenschatzIndiana Supreme Court · 1895

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API