Legal Opinion
Reichard v. Foster Poultry Farms
District Court, E.D. California
Decided March 28, 2006No. 2:06-cr-00238PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING PETITION FOR TEMPORARY INJUNCTION (29 U.S.C. § 160(3))
WANGER, District Judge.
I.INTRODUCTION
Petitioner Alan B. Reichard (“Petitioner”), Director of the Thirty-Second Region of the National Labor Relations Board, on behalf of the Board petitions for a temporary injunction under Section 10(j) of the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 160(j), requiring Respondent Foster Poultry Farms (“Respondent”) to recognize and bargain with the League of Independent Workers (“the League”) during the time the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB” or “the Board”) considers the pending…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Ford Motor Co. (Chicago Stamping Plant) v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Franks Bros. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- National Labor Relations Board v. City Disposal Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. Odessa Union Warehouse Co-Op Cecil A. Schell Edward Sewall Marvin KleynCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- United States v. Nutri-Cology, Inc., D/B/A Allergy Research Group Biocurrents, Inc. Stephen A. Levine Susan D. LevineCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Garcia v. SACRAMENTO COCA-COLA BOTTLING CO., INC.District Court, E.D. California · 2010
- Graphic Communications Conference-International Brotherhood of Teamsters Local 404M v. Bakersfield CalifornianDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2008
- Frankl v. Adams & Associates, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2015
- Norelli Ex Rel. National Labor Relations Board v. Fremont-Rideout Health GroupDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2009